First he was taught to work for everything. Later, to pay for everything. As if earning for her were not enough, he began spending mainly for her.
In the end, she began to work and earn for herself, on what men had built. She began to have her own "independent" money and his money.
Sex, closeness — nature gave them for free. It was the man who was enslaved so that for what is natural, he would have an order and an obligation to pay.
Are you sure, man, that it was the man who created culture, the narrative of culture?
If so, what interest did he have in it? To become a subject? To work for what he can have for free? To use himself up, destroy his own energy, health?
Who could have had the greatest interest in creating law? Law against that which a man naturally has for free. Food, land, closeness.
Nature did not put a price on freedom. A woman sets prices. She demands, requires, expects you to subordinate your own freedom to the narrative.
A narrative in which not only are you to work, build, pay. You are also to compete, destroy yourself against other men. Especially against those who stand in the way, who threaten the established narrative. You are to be for her, against them. Against yourself as well.
How did the woman achieve this?
- Word.
- Narrative.
- Culture.
- Sociology.
- Psychology.
- Education.
The word enters where the fist cannot reach — into what a man should want, what he should do, who he should be. A man has muscles, the strength to act, but the narrative tells him what to use them up on. He listens; actions can be faster than reflection.
A woman will not tell a man this. Women talk about it among themselves. For generations. From generation to generation, men are to do more for women, in the name of women. At their own expense, against themselves.
Once, a man built to work for her.
Today she lives in what he built.
And he is no longer there.
